Three platforms. One compiler.

A runtime executes configuration compiled by Living Policy.

Living Policy Architecture is the compiler. The runtimes are how the compiler proves it works. Each consumes its own family of governance documents and emits its own runtime behavior. Three runtimes ship from the same compiler; the moat scales with each one.

  1. Overture

    in production

    The investment management runtime. Twelve agents in three sub-supervisors. A nine-state governance gate. Hash-chained audit. Same-business-day jurisdictional reconfiguration.

  2. FALCON

    in active development

    The financial reporting runtime — statement creation, review, compliance validation, approval, and regulatory filing across SEC, ESMA, CSSF, FINMA, CSA/OSC, and CIRO frameworks.

  3. Resolve Exchange

    in active development

    The institutional problem-solving runtime — an invite-only marketplace where vetted expert solvers and autonomous agents compete on escrowed, NDA-protected, audited engagements.

The compiler is the moat. The runtimes are how the moat earns.

The compiler is shared across all three runtimes. A second runtime does not require a second compiler — it requires a second target. The economics of the compiler are not the economics of any single runtime; they are the economics of the runtimes-in-aggregate over an engagement horizon.

Living Policy is constructed so that no Dartmouth engagement raises the operating budget of the institutions we serve. The illustrative trajectory below shows the cumulative-cost differential against a legacy advisory baseline.

Cumulative cost — legacy versus Living Policy A line chart over twelve quarters. The legacy line rises monotonically. The Living Policy line peaks early and declines as recurring savings exceed subscription. Illustrative. cumulative cost 0 Q0 Q6 Q12 legacy advisory living policy
Illustrative. The platform pays for itself, or you do not pay.